What DeleteMe And Incogni Aren’t Telling You

ad — Tue, 29 Jul 2025 12:30:47 +0000

While DeleteMe and Incogni can be useful for managing online privacy, it’s important to understand their limitations.

Here are potential downsides:

1. Scope of Removal

Limited Data Brokers: These services typically target a limited number of data brokers, often only a few hundred.
Excluded Data Sources: They generally don’t remove information from government records, court filings, licensing boards, credit agencies, utility companies, or other official sources where a significant amount of data might be.
Private vs. Public Databases: DeleteMe’s focus is primarily on publicly-facing people search sites, with limited attention to private databases.

2. The Illusion of Complete Protection

False Sense of Security: Using these services can create a false sense of security, which may lead to users believing their privacy is fully protected, a LinkedIn post argues. This overconfidence can potentially lead to carelessness and greater exposure.
One Leak is Enough: Even if a service removes data from many sources, a single remaining data point can be enough for malicious actors to identify, track, or locate someone.
Not Addressing the Root Problem: These services address the symptom (data appearing online) rather than the root cause (companies collecting and sharing information without adequate control or transparency).

3. Potential for Increased Exposure

Unintentional Data Delivery: In some cases, these services might inadvertently increase exposure by submitting opt-out requests to data brokers that didn’t previously have information, effectively providing them with a profile.

4. Manual Workarounds and Limitations

DeleteMe’s Hidden Tiers: DeleteMe may have “secret tiers” where additional payment is required for data removal from more sources.
Custom Removal Limitations: DeleteMe has limitations on the number of custom removal requests users can submit.
Incogni’s Limitations: Incogni’s standard plans may lack the custom removal feature.

5. Focus and Approach

DeleteMe’s Approach: DeleteMe is known for its extensive data broker coverage (claiming 750+, though many require manual requests) and extra privacy features like email and phone masking.
Incogni’s Approach: Incogni is known for its automation, cost-effectiveness, broader accessibility, and more favorable privacy policy compared to DeleteMe. It covers a substantial number of brokers and has unlimited custom removals on its higher-tier plans. However, its reports may be less detailed than DeleteMe’s.

In conclusion, while DeleteMe and Incogni offer valuable services in removing personal information from various online sources, they are not a complete solution for online anonymity. A comprehensive approach that includes a mix of these services, manual efforts, and ongoing vigilance is crucial for maintaining control over online privacy.

Note: We do use YouTube Video’s under the “Fair Use” Act under the Copyright Law:

“Fair use is a doctrine in the United States copyright law codified in Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976.¹ It provides for the legal, non-licensed citation or incorporation of copyrighted material in another author’s work without requiring permission from the rights holders, such as for commentary, criticism, news reporting, research, teaching or scholarship.⁰¹ The U.S. Copyright Office Fair Use Index should prove helpful in understanding what courts have to date considered to be fair or not fair but it is not a substitute for legal advice.²“