When A Women Hurts You, Confuse Her Like This

“When A Women Hurts You, Confuse Her Like This” is the title of a popular YouTube video (and related content) that advises men to respond to emotional hurt by maintaining emotional composure and silence rather than reacting with anger or seeking closure.

According to the video’s summary and associated articles, the core strategy involves:

Remaining Unbothered: Instead of arguing, chasing, or begging for an explanation, the man should stay calm and composed.
Creating Uncertainty: By not reacting as expected, the man disrupts the dynamic, causing the woman to question her actions and reassess her perception of him.
Focusing on Self-Improvement: The advice emphasizes using the pain as a catalyst for personal growth and self-mastery, arguing that this inner strength is more attractive and powerful than seeking external validation.

Handling interpersonal hurt—specifically when a partner inflicts pain—by attempting to “confuse” or manipulate them is fundamentally contrary to biblical counseling, orthodox theology, and clinical psychology. Scripture and psychological frameworks do not advocate for tactical emotional games or manipulative retaliation. Instead, they promote righteous boundaries, self-reflection, and radical, Christ-like responses.

Below is an overview of how biblical principles address being hurt by a partner, followed by a simulated “Analyst Report” demonstrating how the specific theologians and psychological profiles you mentioned would evaluate the situation.

10 Biblical Examples of Responding to Interpersonal Hurt

Rather than seeking to play mind games or “confuse” someone, the King James Version (KJV) outlines 10 ways a believer should respond when wronged. This response shifts the focus from retaliation to righteousness, which can naturally confound a worldly perspective.

#	Behavioral Focus	KJV Scripture Reference	Core Practical Principle
1	Return Blessing for Evil	Romans 12:20	“Therefore if thine enemy hunger, feed him; if he thirst, give him drink: for in so doing thou shalt heap coals of fire on his head.” Overcome malice with unexpected kindness.
2	Refuse Retaliation	Proverbs 20:22	“Say not thou, I will recompense evil; but wait on the Lord, and he shall save thee.” Relinquish the desire to get even.
3	Speak with Gentle Wisdom	Proverbs 15:1	“A soft answer turneth away wrath: but grievous words stir up anger.” Defuse an escalating conflict with calm dialogue.
4	Exercise Prudent Restraint	Proverbs 19:11	“The discretion of a man deferreth his anger; and it is his glory to pass over a transgression.” Choose to overlook minor offenses out of maturity.
5	Maintain Quiet Integrity	1 Peter 2:23	“Who, when he was reviled, reviled not again; when he suffered, he threatened not; but committed himself to him that judgeth righteously.” Follow Christ’s model of silent endurance under false accusation.
6	Establish Clear Distances	Proverbs 22:24	“Make no friendship with an angry man; and with a furious man thou shalt not go.” Protect your well-being by stepping away from unrepentant toxicity.
7	Commit Vengeance to God	Romans 12:19	“Dearly beloved, avenge not yourselves, but rather give place unto wrath: for it is written, Vengeance is mine; I will repay, saith the Lord.” Let God execute justice rather than taking it into your own hands.
8	Guard Your Speech	Ephesians 4:31	“Let all bitterness, and wrath, and anger, and clamour, and evil speaking, be put away from you, with all malice.” Refrain from slander or weaponized words.
9	Expose Harm Constructively	Matthew 18:15	“Moreover if thy brother shall trespass against thee, go and tell him his fault between thee and him alone…” Address the hurt directly and privately instead of resorting to passive-aggression.
10	Extend Gospel-Driven Pardon	Ephesians 4:32	“And be ye kind one to another, tenderhearted, forgiving one another, even as God for Christ’s sake hath forgiven you.” Forgive to release the emotional debt, independent of their immediate reaction.

Analyst Reports: Multi-Perspective Evaluation

1. The Reformed Theological Perspectives

John MacArthur Analyst Report:
A sound expository analysis from John MacArthur’s Grace to You framework completely rejects any relational strategies rooted in manipulation, deception, or “confusion.” MacArthur emphasizes the sovereignty of God and the sufficiency of Scripture. If a woman hurts you, the biblical mandate is not psychological warfare, but holiness. He would point strictly to 1 Peter 3 and Ephesians 5, calling the man to act with honor, protect his wife (if married), and respond to personal injury with absolute transparency and biblical discipline (Matthew 18). Trying to “confuse” a partner is a carnal, fleshly impulse that demonstrates a lack of trust in God’s sanctifying work.
Paul Washer Analyst Report:
From Paul Washer’s HeartCry Missionary Society viewpoint, the emphasis lands squarely on a man’s brokenness before a holy God. Washer would look past the woman’s offense to challenge the man’s heart: “Are you walking in a manner worthy of the Gospel?” He would argue that a true man of God does not look for techniques to outmaneuver or mentally disarm a hurting or hurtful woman. Instead, he falls on his knees, repents of his own hidden pride, and exhibits the sacrificial, bleeding love of Jesus Christ on the cross. To Washer, using tactical confusion is an act of spiritual cowardice; a Christian must display sacrificial, uncompromised love and truth.

2. The Christian Counseling & Systems Perspective

Greg Schad Analyst Report:
Analyzing this through a systemic, Christian counseling lens—relying on the clinical approach practiced by Greg Schad at Crossroads Counseling Group—the behavior of trying to “confuse” someone who hurts you is flagged as a dysfunctional, passive-aggressive coping mechanism. Schad’s systems-oriented and relational approach emphasizes clarifying challenges and deepening connection. From this perspective, playing mind games destroys trust, prevents genuine emotional resolution, and breeds deep-seated resentment. Instead of defensive counter-strategies, the focus must shift to identifying personal triggers, establishing firm, healthy emotional boundaries, and engaging in assertive, honest communication to foster sustainable growth.

3. The Psychological & Analytical Perspectives

Jordan Peterson Analyst Report:
Peterson would analyze this dynamic through the lens of individual responsibility and the archetypal struggle against chaos. He would argue that attempting to “confuse” your partner is a form of resentment-driven deceit—a failure to “speak the truth, or at least not lie.” It is a manifestation of the “devouring” or manipulative shadow. Peterson would advise the individual to “clean their room” first: stand up straight with their shoulders back, articulate the grievance clearly, face the conflict voluntarily, and bear the suffering courageously rather than resorting to low-level Machiavellian games that ultimately destabilize the relationship and the self.
Carl Jung Analyst Report:
Jung would view the impulse to “confuse” the woman as a classic projection of the Anima (the unconscious feminine archetype within the male psyche). When a man is hurt by a woman, his fragile ego often retaliates by using unconscious, deceptive, or emotional tactics—mirroring the very negative qualities he projects onto her. Jung would state that trying to manipulate or confuse her is a defensive maneuver to avoid facing one’s own Shadow. The solution requires individuation: integrating the hurt, recognizing how one’s own unconscious complexes are playing out, and moving away from infantile power-dynamics toward psychological maturity.
Myers-Briggs (MBTI) Analyst Report:
An MBTI analysis reveals that this situation differs based on cognitive functions:
- Thinking types (T), especially INTJs or INTPs, might naturally resort to cold detachment or silent logic when hurt, which partners mistakenly interpret as a calculated strategy to “confuse” them. In reality, it is simply an internal processing mechanism.
- Feeling types (F), like INFJs or ENFJs, might inadvertently create confusion through the “INFJ Door Slam”—a sudden, absolute emotional boundary deployed when their values are deeply violated.
- The Consensus: Regardless of type, using your personality traits as a weapon to deliberately disorient a partner is an unhealthly, immature utilization of cognitive functions. Healthy type-development requires moving away from defensive manipulation and toward open, constructive dialogue.

Note: We do use YouTube Video’s under the “Fair Use” Act under the Copyright Law:

“Fair use is a doctrine in the United States copyright law codified in Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976.¹ It provides for the legal, non-licensed citation or incorporation of copyrighted material in another author’s work without requiring permission from the rights holders, such as for commentary, criticism, news reporting, research, teaching or scholarship.⁰¹ The U.S. Copyright Office Fair Use Index should prove helpful in understanding what courts have to date considered to be fair or not fair but it is not a substitute for legal advice.²“