What if your Bible isn't based on the Hebrew Text Always?

If a Bible translation is not based on the Masoretic Text (the standard Hebrew source for the Old Testament), it typically relies on alternative ancient manuscripts or translations, such as the Septuagint (Greek), the Dead Sea Scrolls, or the Samaritan Pentateuch.

Textual Variants: Using these sources can result in different word choices, verse numbers, or even entire passages that are absent or altered in the standard Hebrew text. For example, the Septuagint often reflects a slightly different Hebrew Vorlage and includes books not found in the Jewish Tanakh (known as the Apocrypha or Deuterocanon).
Translation Differences: Translators may choose these alternative base texts to resolve ambiguities in the Masoretic Text or to align with historical Christian traditions that predate the standardization of the Hebrew canon.
Scholarly Consensus: While the Masoretic Text remains the primary basis for most modern Protestant and Jewish translations, scholars frequently consult the Dead Sea Scrolls and the Septuagint to correct perceived errors or clarify obscure passages in the final translation.

King James Version (KJV) highlights that while its Old Testament is predominantly based on the Hebrew Masoretic Text, its translators occasionally integrated readings from the Greek Septuagint (LXX), the Latin Vulgate, or traditional rabbinic interpretations (Qere/Ketiv variants).

10 Examples of KJV Departures or Variants from the Literal Hebrew Text

The table below details ten notable instances where the KJV text diverges from or modifies the standard Hebrew consonantal text:

Verse	KJV Text	Standard Hebrew Text (Literal)	Source/Influence Followed
Psalm 22:16	“They pierced my hands and my feet.”	“Like a lion, my hands and my feet.”	Greek Septuagint (oryxan) & Latin Vulgate.
Isaiah 14:12	“How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer…”	“How art thou fallen… O Shining One / Morning Star (Helel).”	Latin Vulgate (Lucifer, meaning light-bearer).
2 Samuel 21:19	“…Elhanan… slew the brother of Goliath the Gittite…”	“…Elhanan… slew Goliath the Gittite…”	Textual smoothing/Harmonization with 1 Chronicles 20:5.
Job 13:15	“Though he slay me, yet will I trust in him.”	“Though he slay me, I have no hope.”	Follows the Hebrew Qere (marginal reading) over the Ketiv (written text).
Psalm 100:3	“…it is he that hath made us, and not we ourselves…”	“…it is he that hath made us, and we are his…”	Follows the Hebrew Qere variant (lo = to him vs. lo = not).
Isaiah 9:3	“Thou hast multiplied the nation, and not increased the joy…”	“Thou hast multiplied the nation, and increased their joy…”	Follows the written Ketiv text (“not”), creating a contextual paradox.
Jeremiah 23:6	“…he shall be called, THE LORD OUR RIGHTEOUSNESS.”	“…he shall be called, Jehovah-Tsidkenu.”	Anglization and substitution of the Tetragrammaton (YHWH).
Genesis 49:10	“Until Shiloh come…”	“Until that which belongs to him comes…”	Early Christian and rabbinic interpretive traditions rather than strict literalism.
Psalm 16:10	“…neither wilt thou suffer thine Holy One to see corruption.”	“…neither wilt thou suffer thy holy ones (plural) to see corruption.”	Follows a minority Hebrew manuscript tradition, supported by Septuagint messianic syntax.
Proverbs 11:31	“Behold, the righteous shall be recompensed in the earth…”	“If the righteous is repaid on earth…”	Relies heavily on the interpretive phrasing found in the Septuagint.

Analyst Reports on Textual Variations

1. Myers-Briggs (MBTI) Analyst Report

Analytical Lens: Cognitive Processing, Systems Thinking, and Structural Paradigms.
The Assessment: From a Typology standpoint (specifically involving Introverted Intuition (Ni) and Extraverted Thinking (Te)), the revelation that the KJV is not purely Hebrew forces a shift from a literalist framework to a systemic framework.
The Breakdown:
- Si (Introverted Sensing) types may experience initial cognitive dissonance because their stability relies on the immutability of an established tradition (e.g., KJV-Onlyism).
- NT (Rational) types view this as a fascinating historical data point. To an NT analyst, a translation is an optimized, multi-layered information processing system. The inclusion of the Septuagint or Vulgate text is viewed pragmatically—as an early form of crowdsourced data refinement meant to bridge linguistic gaps for theological coherence.

2. John MacArthur Analyst Report

Analytical Lens: Biblical Inerrancy, Expository Primacy, and Cessation of Autographs.
The Assessment: God breathed out His word perfectly in the original autographs (Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek), not in a 1611 English translation.
The Breakdown: MacArthur holds a high view of scripture but strongly rejects “KJV-Onlyism.” He would argue that understanding these variations underscores why pastors must study original languages. If the KJV translators leaned on the Septuagint for Psalm 22:16, it demonstrates their desire to highlight christological fulfillment. However, the ultimate authority rests on what the Holy Spirit originally inspired, meaning modern textual criticism is a vital tool for recovering the most accurate readings, rather than dogmatically clinging to late manuscript traditions.

3. Jordan Peterson Analyst Report

Analytical Lens: Psychological Archetypes, Evolutionary Linguistics, and Meta-Narratives.
The Assessment: The text of the Bible is not merely a static historical document; it is an evolving ecosystem of human consciousness and moral articulation.
The Breakdown: Peterson would view the KJV’s integration of Latin and Greek concepts (like Lucifer in Isaiah 14) as a profound manifestation of how stories adapt across cultures over millennia. The translation process represents a collective psychological distillation. When the KJV chooses a reading that emphasizes a messianic archetype over a strict, localized Hebrew phrase, it selects for the meta-narrative value that binds Western civilization together. It is “true” not merely as literal cryptography, but as a functionally emergent psychological landscape that has guided human action for centuries.

4. Paul Washer Analyst Report

Analytical Lens: Gospel Centrality, Regenerate Church Membership, and Holy Awe.
The Assessment: It is a dangerous and prideful distraction to turn a specific translation into an idol, while your own heart remains far from the holiness demanded by that very book.
The Breakdown: Washer’s focus would immediately bypass academic squabbling to target the conscience. He would assert that whether the Hebrew text reads “like a lion” or “they pierced,” the staggering reality remains: Jesus Christ was crushed for our iniquities. Washer warns that many people will go to hell with a perfect knowledge of textual variants or a fierce defense of the KJV, yet without ever being broken by the law of God or transformed by the Holy Spirit. Use the best text available, preach it with absolute fear and trembling, and stop hiding behind textual arguments to avoid personal repentance.

Note: We do use YouTube Video’s under the “Fair Use” Act under the Copyright Law:

“Fair use is a doctrine in the United States copyright law codified in Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976.¹ It provides for the legal, non-licensed citation or incorporation of copyrighted material in another author’s work without requiring permission from the rights holders, such as for commentary, criticism, news reporting, research, teaching or scholarship.⁰¹ The U.S. Copyright Office Fair Use Index should prove helpful in understanding what courts have to date considered to be fair or not fair but it is not a substitute for legal advice.²“